Thursday, October 27, 2011

The Nature of Teshuva

Reading about Dr Schectman’s expulsion from the scientific community, one finds oneself confused. What was it about the future Nobel prize winner’s questioning, that warranted this drastic action? Surely in a scientific community dedicated to furthering knowledge, there would be an honored place for an innovator such as Dr Scechtman? What better way is there to succeed in research, than asking fundamental questions? Yet, Dr Schectman was not saught after as a valuable asset to his team, far from it. The mere presence of an individual who actually questioned a fundamental of established science was intolerable to his community and resulted in his being shunned? How do we explain this? What mechanism underlies this human disposition to discredit a thinker who dares to question the established order?

The answer lies, in appreciating the complexity of human nature. On the one hand we are like Dr Schectman, a Tzelem Elokim,a mind blessed with an insatiable desire to draw ever nearer to His Absolute Knowledge. As Ralbag points out nicely, this absolute knowledge, is unattainable to us. Yet, via exploration of His Creations, in Chemistry Physics and other disciplines, we can draw ever nearer, in our models of science.
Blessed and most revered be the tzur ("rock"), foundation of all existence, whose “insight” (T'vunaso) , “wisdom” (chochmaso) and “knowledge” (Daato) bring into being, a system of existing things, whose existence exhibits a wisdom and grace which none but He can completely apprehend.

It is vital that we keep in mind that it is impossible for us to completely apprehend the wisdom and grace expressed in the nature of the Torah’s existence. In reality we know but a pittance and are ignorant of much, as is the case with our knowledge of the nature of all existing things with regard to their wisdom and grace. In reality we apprehend but very little, as is well known to all those who do real research in the natural sciences- and come to appreciate the gap between our models of the of the laws of the Universe and their reality.
The very limitation of our apprehension, is naturally painful to us. Our psychic makeup causes us to desire to be Elohim, great beings secure in power over their environments. We yearn for science to cure cancer and disease extending our power over the environment, not to point out our frailty. We need to have confidence in our pillars of science, in the absence of such pillars education would be impossible, as would much applied research.

Much as we can identify with the pioneering spirit of Dr Schectman, we must be be able to appreciate the limitation of his community as well. It is understandable that the research community would at first reject fundamental questioning. Much research depends upon applying established knowledge to new particular cases. If a biologist is not confident in the core notion of DNA, how is he to spend the long years needed to become educated in his field? How is he to dedicate himself to applying this notion to the myriad of cases available in the real world?

It is recognizing the tension between our psychic needs for security and dignity in the application of old models of knowledge, alongside our need to move ever closer to Him through attaining breakthroughs in models that we come to understand the natural relationship of Teshuva and time.

We should be working through the complexity of our relationships with “Dr Schectman’s” on a yearly basis. The conflict between security in our current representation of the world, and its absolute reality should be playing out, on a regular basis, it is the lifeblood of the human community. The nature of Teshuva, the motion of ever increasing recognition of the limitations of the psychic world and motion toward the Absolute, is therefore the central theme of Moadot. How this is so will be explored in the next post.

21 comments:

moonlight1021 said...

Could you explain what exactly were the limitation that Dr. Schectman's community suffered from which led them to reject his findings? were they too emotionally attached to what they perceived as fundamentals that they could not see beyond that? is it something psychological, they didn't have the necessary discipline of the mind to think beyond?

Hagyan said...

R.JS: "The very limitation of our apprehension, is naturally painful to us. ..."

This turns the Ralbag on his head. And בראשית. You'd never sell this notion to my mechanic, which is why I trust him with my car and with my life. "Painful"? An anomaly to him is like the wind filling a sailor's sail.

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Moonlight

The limitation of the community lies in seeking security in a particular paradigm of thought.

This security is natural to us as psychic beings and takes time to transcend.

Hagyan

The mechanic, being an experimental sort, would tend to enjoy anomaly of a certain class. The mechanic though would still have a predisposition to solve these anomalies within familiar parameters though.

moonlight1021 said...

What is the guarantee that when one shifts from one paradigm of thought to another there will be security in the later?

Can it be that if one attributed security to the first paradigm of thought that one needs to transcend, when he does transcend to the proper paradigm of thought he may continue to feel somewhat insecure anyway in spite of logic?

Hagyan said...

I attempted, via משל, to indicate when the בעלות of the בעל מלעכה quintessentially occurs, and that, in lived experience, its "activity" "connects" him joyously with the טוב of בראשית . The תורה speaks to the בעל מלעכה both in terms of: (1) the potentialities that his בעלות lacks, but also (2) the potentialities that his בעלות has. Because of (1) the בעל מלעכה needs to "gravitate" toward his proper rank in a good political regime. Because of (2) the leaders of that regime can address him as "מלאכי 'ה צבאות", i.e., as fiduciaries rather than as dominators. In fact, only the enlightenment catalyzed by the leaders can make the בעל מלאכה want to "gravitate" toward his proper rank.

Hagyan said...

I noticed that I amputated my last sentence. Please append:

This political systems-dynamic, in itself a טוב, as well as Its Cause, is stated by David as:

משוך חסדך, ליודעיך; וצדקתך, לישרי לב

Hagyan said...

Another addendum:

We can wrap this back around to your primary subject.

The leader's problem is: "How, possibly, can I communicate this luminous reality to everyone?!" I think the answer is the זמנים, commanded by God, but "administered" by the leader-fiduciary as political institutions:

נחלתי עדוותיך, לעולם: כי ששון ליבי, המה.

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Hagyan

Are you saying that a Rav, in the sense of mitzvat Kavod Harav, is a kind, or excellence of baal melacha?

Hagyan said...

RJS: No.

1. The בעל מלאכה is the "nexus" of politics because בעלי מלאכה are "many" while those who are "higher" are "few". Politics is the problem of the "many".

2. As the ancients might say: you can't have a 'city' without בעלי מלאכה.

3. Though it would inherently be running on "borrowed time" because doomed to conquest, a 'city' can devolve to a state in which the "few" are absent or inconsequential; i.e., the 'art of war' points, at a minimum, to God's חנינה, as well as to מצוות which only an "insane" regime would transgress. Consider: Even Ahmadinejad employs real physicists. (Corollary: חילול שבת really is treason.)

4. The בעל מלאכה has real, stable קדושה. However: (i.) This קדושה is sectorial, rather than generalized, and thus poses no threat to ע"ז; and (ii.) the בעל מלאכה inherently lacks an autonomous capacity for קידוש השם הגדול.

Hagyan said...

RJS, I recalled that you occasionally enjoy my oddball Gedankenexperimenten, so I offer a couple that are about the basis of what I'm trying to talk about.

#1: Over a 30-year period, while your grandchildren are raising your great-grandchildren, a previously-unknown, deadly, incurable virus selectively and inexorably infects and kills-off all the true בעלי מלאכה, while the apprentices and journeymen survive unafflicted. Write a "screenplay" for this horror movie. (Remember the old black-and-white Japanese movies about giant earthworms that used to be shown on post-midnight T.V.?)

#2: Same as #1, but the virus is selective for the "few".

Indeed, "אתה חונן לאדם דעת"!

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

The תורה speaks to the בעל מלאכה both in terms of: (1) the potentialities that his בעלות lacks, but also (2) the potentialities that his בעלות has. Because of (1) the בעל מלאכה needs to "gravitate" toward his proper rank in a good political regime. Because of (2) the leaders of that regime can address him as "מלאכי 'ה צבאות", i.e., as fiduciaries rather than as dominators. In fact, only the enlightenment catalyzed by the leaders can make the בעל מלאכה want to "gravitate" toward his proper rank.

This political systems-dynamic, in itself a טוב, as well as Its Cause, is stated by David as:

משוך חסדך, ליודעיך; וצדקתך, לישרי לב

Can you connect these terms to the picture of the Gedanken? It is a little confusing because, in the Gedanken, you distinguish journeyman and baal melacha in terms of tikun guf power, but in no way show the "gravitation to proper rank" aided by the Rav?

moonlight1021 said...

For future reference, can you please provide translation of the Hebrew words you type within your English sentence or just type them in English directly? I personally am not a fan when people take Hebrew words and mix them into English sentences, if it's English I think the Hebrew words should appear either transliterated or in English. If it's an entire Hebrew sentence that would be quoted, then that's different, it can show up all in Hebrew.

Anonymous said...

R.JS: Over Shabat I was stumped looking for a focused answer to your question, perhaps because it casts such a wide net. I thought the following might help to "chunk" the phenomena; if this doesn't help I'll try my best to address your question as it now stands.

Some time around Passover, you remarked on a difference in how a 'Halachic thinker' and a logician would set up a problem and commence inquiry. So here's a Halachic point-of-departure, to complement the phenomenal one.

Consider these two halachot:

[הלכות ברכות ז/א]

מנהגות רבות נהגו חכמי ישראל בסעודה, וכולן
דרך ארץ הן; ואלו הן: כשנכנסין לסעודה, גדול שבכולן נוטל ידיו תחילה, ואחר כך נכנסין, ויושבין מסובין. וגדול מסב בראש, ושני לו למטה ממנו; היו שלוש מיטות, גדול מסב בראש, ושני לו למעלה ממנו, ושלישי לו למטה ממנו.

[מסכת אבות ג/ו]:

רבי נחוניה בן הקנה אומר, כל המקבל עליו עול תורה, מעבירין ממנו עול מלכות ועול דרך ארץ; וכל הפורק ממנו עול תורה, נותנין עליו עול מלכות ועול דרך ארץ.

Except in the most "insane" and dysfunctional regimes, a "prototype" of 'דרך ארץ' can always be found "down in the trenches" of economic production and national defense. It is an emergent 'sectorial' political order ('gravitation') ever-flowing from a 'sectorial' "תורה שבעל פה". Its enemies are capital-'C' Culture, political ideology, religion, etc., which must interfere with 'עול דרך ארץ' while appearing to be its supports.


One more separate remark ...

R.JS: "... [I]n the Gedanken, you distinguish journeyman and baal melacha in terms of tikun guf power ..."

In the phenomena a 'tikun guf power' is not the differentiating principle. There's no inherent limit on the journeyman's material productivity (in contrast with the apprentice), except if he encounters 'anomalies' (in the trenches they're called 'show-stoppers'). This is why journeymen are the backbone of economic production (e.g., skilled factory workers) and national defense (e.g., fully-trained enlisted men).

Anonymous said...

A visual metaphor. Newton would never have grasped universal gravitation from a world like this ...

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

A visual metaphor. Newton would never have grasped universal gravitation from a world like this

"A world like this" meaning the world of production and military action?

So what is the exact difference between Newton and the true Craftsman, the one who finds cures for new diseases such as the Gedanken one of Japanese worms?

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Also please classify Dr Schectman within the distinction in the previous comment.

Anonymous said...

R.JS,

1. Re. the visual metaphor: At the link target there was a surreal animation of a world with laws categorically different from ours. Could your computer display it?

2. I think the symbolic equation 'true craftsman' = 'בעל מלעכה' risks making language diverge from the phenomena. American vernacular "carves up" (or: "parses") the phenomena of craft in a way that equivocates the term 'בעלות', and so defeats our inquiry. By contrast, every craft community-of-practice I know has its own ad hoc discourse which is just unequivocal enough to catalyze its members' recognition of its 'בעלי מלעכה' and thus allow "gravitation" to function relatively unimpeded.

3. Re. "... cures for new diseases ...": In our day the boundaries between the sciences, the engineering disciplines and clinical medicine are very fluid. Cures for new diseases might be found by clinical בעלי מלאכה, engineering-type בעלי מלאכה, or scientists. With respect to the Gedankenexperiment one would have to judge the particulars of a specific medical advance. Until one is at a late stage of "fine-tuning" one's notions, it's much better to consider things like Toyota factories and the 101st Airborne Division.

4. Re. Isaac Newton and Dan Shechtman: Leveraging the two halachot I cited yesterday, and speaking approximately: They are 'גדולים' whose vision has been considerably unshackled from 'עול דרך ארץ'. They also exemplify uncommon liberation from 'עול מלכות'. The "exact difference" between scientists and craftsmen is to be found in הלכות יסודי התורה פרק א. (What I'm trying to home-in on, which is at least as important to Torah, is the exact phenomenon that's present in both the 'scientist' and the 'craftsman', though they differ in the precision with which they can recognize it and "respond" to it.)

5. Beyond #4: Maybe I can explain my orientation with a personal comment. It took me about 40 years to achieve a decent grasp of the rudiments of physics. Today I regard it as the severest misfortune that in my youth no-one I depended upon -- neither my professors nor my rabbis -- knew how "physicist-ness", or "עול-תורה-ness", can be "grown" from the state of 'עול דרך ארץ' at which I was stuck.

Anonymous said...

R.JS,

Picking up a possible loose end ...

On October 31, 2011 7:15 AM you commented:

"Are you saying that a Rav, in the sense of mitzvat Kavod Harav, is a kind, or excellence of baal melacha?"

I thought you were talking about a Rav of Torah, i.e., 'non-sectorial'. Such a Rav has progressed categorically beyond the בעל מלאכ. Though that's important, I wonder now if I missed your meaning. Did you mean that the בעל מלאכה stands in the Rav-relation, 'sectorially', with respect to his apprentices and journeymen?

At the end of my #4 I added, parenthetically:

What I'm trying to home-in on, which is at least as important to Torah, is the exact phenomenon that's present in both the 'scientist' and the 'craftsman', though they differ in the precision with which they can recognize it and "respond" to it.

Might that be a "close point of approach" to your question?

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

I think my question is answered, thank you Hagyan. Lets continue the discussion after my next post.

moonlight1021 said...

RJS, and when will you post your next post? ;)

Anonymous said...

R.JS: 'Sectorial' kavod la-Rav in 0.8 seconds:

See this video at 1:09. It's not on the audio track, but flashes by in the blue and the yellow transcript areas. Watch for the exchange:

[15:27:23.2 EST] Captain: "My aircraft."
[15:27:24.0 EST] First Officer: "Your aircraft."