Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Toelet vs Taanug

In the previous post, I noted that Ralbag emphasizes a purposeful approach to life. This emphasis expresses itself in Ralbag's approach to mitzvot, which are founded on the notion of “toelet”, aiding man in his proper pursuit of benefit. This commitment to toelet underlies the distinction between abstaining vs not doing of melacha. Clearly, abstaining from melacha involves a shift to a superior focus rather than merely an absence of melacha behavior. What remains to be understood is the nature of this superior focus saught through abstention. What is this superior focus pursued on Shabbat?

To answer this, it is critical to note that Shabbat is one of the 10 dibrot, a mitzva that has a special role in the purposeful life. For Ralbag, the 10 dibrot are the archetypes of the purposeful life, collectively articulating the essential elements of Toelet for the Taryag system as a whole. Each and every one of the mitzvot, in some way, builds upon the life mission of toelet articulated in skeleton form in the 10 dibrot. Given his view of Dibrot, it is clear that Ralbag's understanding of Shvita memalacha lies at the very heart of the pursuit of toelet underlying the Mitzva system. As a dibrah, Shevita mimelacha is clearly fundamental to the pursuit of toelet. To understand Shabat then, presupposes insight into the role of “toelet” in human action generally.

Toelet is best understood in contrast with its alternative- Taanug. Taanug is the basis of action of the unreflective person whose motivation is limited to pursuit of pleasure alone. A wise person acts on the basis of Toelet - the richer sense of opportunity afforded by reflection. One who is motivated by Toelet has a much wider sense of functionality that includes sensory pleasure in proper measure among other human needs.

To understand this distinction, it is instructive to consider the case of the dieter. Clearly the overeater's over indulgence in food, is not simply ignorance in the area of calorie intake. One could provide the overweight person with a clear diet and still find them overeating on a regular basis. Overeating results from attraction to perceived benefits following from food pleasure, rather than a mere ignorance of calorie counts. In its extreme taanug form, the perceived benefit from food pleasure can be all encompassing. Lacking a realm of human function beyond the sensory, the pleasure of eating is called upon to compensate, leading to overeating. eating becomes the basis of comfort and celebration distraction and self reward. To succeed, the overeater must gain insight into the underlying fact that his notion of benefit is limited to taanug and learn to seek toelet.

The successful dieter therefore is not one with superior “will power”. Rather, the successful dieter must gain an insight into himself as an organism, come to appreciate his opportunities in the world at a deeper, richer level. This recognition of the possibility of a richer life of toelet is liberating. Toelet removes the act of eating from the framework of pleasure alone and opens up the possibility of considering it in a much broader sense of a broad based sense of human functionality.

Ralbag teaches that this process of insight allowing for the shift from sensory pleasure to the possibility of functionality is fundamental to human development generally. It is not only “eating” that can be limited by the pursuit of sensory entertainment for its own sake. Every human act begins as sensory entertainment, from eating and drinking to sexuality from play to art.

Insight into the functionality of human behavior is not a one time event. The release of the self from a habitual taanug orientation, does not give way to a fully formed sense of toelet- no exploration works in this way. What insight opens up is the possibility of growth in the toelet concept, there are many many stages in this process. As such, true success depends on an education that challenges man to seek ever more profound formulations of functionality. But where does this recognition of toelet begin? It is here that the notion of dibrot and Shabbat enter the picture. The next post will explore this extension of the notion of the toelet concept.

10 comments:

moonlight1021 said...

i've read in the book NISHMAT AVRAHAM Medical Halacha for Doctors Nurses Health-care Personnel and Patients by Abraham S. Abraham that there are doctors out there who enter the medical profession because of the financial benefits (higher wages) associated with the profession but he says that when a doctor performs a mitzvah for the patient, the doctor has to focus on attending the patient and so on the mitzvah itself and it's therefore impossible to focus on the financial benefits associated with the process. so in terms of the motivation, even if the motivation is not pure, once one engages in a mitzvah i guess it's impossible to just focus on the limited aspects of it. now i don't know how would this shift in perspective that occurs for a doctor also work for someone who eats more than he needs.

moonlight1021 said...

Rabbi Chaim Brovender, founder of WebYeshiva:

Shabbat Halacha
http://www.youtube.com/user/webyeshiva#p/c/AE0A804C3A74FB82

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaim_Brovender

Matt said...

Insight into the functionality of human behavior is not a one time event. The release of the self from a habitual taanug orientation, does not give way to a fully formed sense of toelet- no exploration works in this way. What insight opens up is the possibility of growth in the toelet concept, there are many many stages in this process. As such, true success depends on an education that challenges man to seek ever more profound formulations of functionality. But where does this recognition of toelet begin? It is here that the notion of dibrot and Shabbat enter the picture.

Up until that last sentence, I was going to answer: "It begins with the yiras Hashem of Mishlei!" Mishlei meets the taanug-seeker on his own level and shows him that greater taanug can be achieved through a reflective, toeles-oriented mentality. At first, the student of Mishlei will still be addicted to taanug. However, over time, the training in toeles-thinking will open his mind to other possibilities. According to my understanding, THAT is where the notion of dibros and Shabbos would enter the picture. Am I missing something?

Matt said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Moonlight

Please summarize your thesis and question in your own simple language. I am interested and would like to answer you.

Matt

7 יִרְאַת יְהוָה רֵאשִׁית דָּעַת; חָכְמָה ווּמוּסָר, אֱוִילִים בָּזווּ׃ פ

Is Yirat Hashem a method of pursing maximal pleasure alone? Or is it the foundational basis of Order of all things that the pursuit of Chochma and mussar both follow from?

moonlight1021 said...

Does this sound better? I was trying to say when one engages in a certain activity his motives may be questioned regarding whether he does that activity for the sake of the mitzvah or for the sake of the reward.

However, we can say at least hypothetically there are certain activities where even though one does start doing things for reasons that do not have pure motivation, it is okay to allow that person to start like this because while engaged in that activity one would not be able to preserve the perspective of seeking the reward for too long and so that person's perspective would shift and become motivated by unselfish reasons, doing a mitzvah for the sake of the mitzvah. Would you agree?

Yet I wanted to know if this would be dependent on the activity that one is engaged in? For example, my hypothesis was that for a doctor this may be easier to come to the conclusion that medical treatment should be done for pure reasons than for one who is eating a lot? How do you view this? What is the cure in order to shift someone's perspective in the proper direction?
Would you say there are certain activities where this is harder to be done? And would it be harder for someone who is eating too much vs. one who is a doctor?

In the Way of G-d: Derech Hashem, Moshe Chayim Luzzatto also discusses this perspective and applies it to those who start learning Torah for selfish reasons but he says the Torah has the power to change a person if one keeps learning.

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Moonlight

What does it mean to do a mitzva for its own sake? Does Man exist for Mitzvos, or do Mitzvos exist for Man?

Matt said...

The latter.

moonlight1021 said...

It's both--Jews keep Shabbos and Shabbos keeps the Jews!!!!!!

moonlight1021 said...

To do a mitzvah for its own sake means to do a mitzvah without expecting a reward.

One shouldn't think he is the one doing the work and that's why he deserves a reward, but rather it's Hashem who is doing the work, the person is only assisting Hashem in doing the mitzvos.