Thursday, December 10, 2009

Are we ready for Teshuva from Hanahaga of the לץ?

Courtesy of Tabletmag


By Jeffrey Goldberg



Ten years ago, I visited Orrin Hatch, the senior senator from Utah and a prominent member of the [Mormon] Church, on Capitol Hill. I was writing for The New York Times Magazine and Hatch was thinking of running for president. We talked about politics for a few minutes, and then he said, “Have you heard my love songs?”
No senator had asked me that question before. It turned out that Hatch was a prolific songwriter, not only of love songs, but of Christian spirituals as well. We spent an hour in his office listening to some of his music, a regular Mormon platter party. After five or six Christmas songs, I asked, him, “What about Hanukkah songs? You have any of those?”
I have always felt that the song canon for Hanukkah, a particularly interesting historical holiday, is sparse and uninspiring, in part because Jewish songwriters spend so much time writing Christmas music. Several years earlier, as a columnist for The Jerusalem Post, I sponsored a Write-a-New-Song-for-Hanukkah contest. I received more than 200 entries. Most were dreck. The songs I liked best were the ones uninfected by self-distancing Jewish irony, songs that actually wrestled with the complicated themes of Hanukkah—religious freedom, political extremism, the existence, or non-existence, of an interventionist God—in a more earnest way.
Hatch lit up at my suggestion. He asked me to jot down some possible themes, which I did. Then he got sidetracked by his presidential campaign. (He didn’t win.) Still, time went on, and no song.
I never forgot about it, though. My interest in the Hanukkah story has stayed with me. I’m even writing a biography of Judah Maccabee for Nextbook Press. Last December, while reading From Ezra to the Last of the Maccabees, by Elias Bickerman, my mind wandered back to Orrin Hatch’s promise, and so I reminisced on my Atlantic blog about the time Hatch nearly wrote a Hanukkah song for me. A couple of days later, I received an email that read, “Dear Jeff, I know it’s nine years too late, but I hope you will like some of the following ideas.” What followed were five verses of a sincerely felt Hanukkah song.
I didn’t quite believe it was Hatch writing me, so I wrote back, asking this alleged Hatch to call.
The next night was Christmas Eve, and my family and I were wandering the aisles of the Martinsburg, West Virginia, Wal-Mart. (Don’t ask.) My children had just discovered something miraculous—a display case filled with kosher products. We had never seen this before. I began to deliver a lecture in the kosher food aisle, explaining that what we were seeing was further proof indeed that America is a Promised Land for our people, a place where even the Wal-Mart in Martinsburg, West Virginia, carries Manischewitz matzo-ball mix. It was at this moment that my cell phone rang.
“Jeff, it’s Orrin,” I heard over the phone. “What do you think of the song?” It was, indeed, Hatch. The second miracle of the night.
“Senator Hatch,” I said. “It’s Christmas Eve.”
“Yes, it is!” Hatch replied. “What about the song?”
“Senator,” I said, “I love the song.”
And I do. It’s a delightful thing to have Orrin Hatch write a song for Hanukkah. Of course I appreciate the absurdist quality to this project, but I also deeply appreciate Hatch’s earnestness. His lyrics are not postmodern or cynical, which is a blessing, because I for one have tired of the Adam Sandlerization of Judaism in America. Yes, we are, as a people, funny (at least when compared to other people, such as Croatians) but our neuroses, well-earned though they may be, have caused us to lacerate our own traditions, which are in fact (to borrow from Barack Obama) awesome. The story of Hanukkah is a good case in point—maybe the perfect one.
I also appreciate the song because Hatch’s collaborator, Madeline Stone, has written music that, to borrow this time from Felix Unger, is happy and peppy and bursting with love. And I love the fact that the song’s producer, Peter Bliss, hired a delightful singer named Rasheeda Azar, who was not only a back-up vocalist for Paula Abdul (Jew) and Janet Jackson (not a Jew) but is a Syrian-American from Terre Haute, Indiana. Rasheeda’s participation closes a circle of sorts, since the Syrian King Antiochus was, of course, the antagonist in the story of the Maccabean revolt.
And so it was a very American day in a recording studio on West 54th Street in Manhattan when we gathered to hear Rasheeda sing. In one small room were Bliss; Madeline Stone, a Jewish songwriter who writes contemporary Christian music in Nashville; a crew of downtown Jews from Tablet Magazine; Hatch’s chief of staff, Jace Johnson, who didn’t seem to know exactly what he was doing there, but was very nice about the whole episode; and Hatch himself, who sang background vocals and even showed us the mezuzah he wears under his shirt. Hatch, like many Mormons, is something of a philo-Semite, and though he is under no illusions about Jewish political leanings in America—he told me that though he likes Barbra Streisand very much, he’s fairly sure she doesn’t like him—he possesses a heartfelt desire to reach out to Jews.
Hatch said he hoped his song would be understood not only as a gift to the Jewish people but that it would help bring secular Jews to a better understanding of their own holiday. “I know a lot of Jewish people that don’t know what Hanukkah means,” he said. Jewish people, he said, should “take a look at it and realize the miracle that’s being commemorated here. It’s more than a miracle; it’s the solidification of the Jewish people.”
He’s right. Without Judah Maccabee’s militant intervention in 167 BCE, the Syrian program of forced Hellenization might have brought about a premature end to the Jewish story.

9 comments:

moonlight1021 said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz61J9MaQSo&feature=related

Funny Mincha--aka: Jewish humor.

moonlight1021 said...

This is such an important question, "Are we ready for Teshuva from Hanahaga of the לץ?" So what is the answer?

If the לץ=joker, take Batman vs. the Joker, the joker is the worse villain ever.

The Joker is portrayed as a master criminal whose characterization has varied from that of a violent psychopath to a goofy trickster-thief. He is the archenemy of Batman, having been directly responsible for numerous tragedies in Batman's life, including the paralysis of Barbara Gordon and the death of Jason Todd, the second Robin.

Throughout the character's long history, there have been several different origin tales; they most commonly depict him as falling into a vat of chemical waste, which bleaches his skin and turns his hair green and his lips bright red, giving him the appearance of a clown.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joker_(comics)

Unknown said...

Moonlight - a letz is no joker - he is a sophist who uses comedy to undermine the authorities - think Jon Steward, Stephan Colbert and Bill Maher.

moonlight1021 said...

Thank you for the explanation.

Story time: It so happens a bit more than a year ago I found a good dark blue North Face bookbag in front of my house with the inscription JESTER. And I can't help remembering that you-know-who-rabbi's daughter dressed up as a clown. Riddle: A year later, we're talking about the letz and we're supposed to do teshuvah from it too. So...maybe being a letz is a good profession after all. It'll so exempt us from teshuva.

moonlight1021 said...

Well-well who would've thought?

"Many native traditions held clowns and tricksters as essential to any contact with the sacred. People could not pray until they had laughed, because laughter opens and frees from rigid preconception. Humans had to have tricksters within the most sacred ceremonies for fear that they forget the sacred comes through upset, reversal, surprise. The trickster in most native traditions is essential to creation, to birth".[1]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickster

Dan said...

Rabbi,

I assume by latze you are referring to the author. He makes some good points, the best being, I think, that contrary to popular belief, Chanukah is comprised of complicated themes. Is this not a perfect example of "aizeh who chacham? halomed mikol adam" and "shema haemes mime sheomroh"?

Are you suggesting the Teshuva that we can learn from this is to look past our immature understanding of Chanukah to the more realistic complicated themes of Chanukah?

moonlight1021 said...

Oh Monsieur Dan is asking such complex questions, moi and my simple mind would've never thought to such a high level...nu, no offense anyone...the position for jester has been filled...by moi...now everybody else can go do teshuvah-the letz/jester get diplomatic immunity.


"In ancient times courts employed fools and by the Middle Ages the jester was a familiar figure. In Renaissance times, aristocratic households in Britain employed licensed fools or jesters, who sometimes dressed as other servants were dressed, but generally wore a motley (i.e. parti-coloured) coat, hood with ass's ears or a red-flannel coxcomb and bells. Regarded as pets or mascots, they served not simply to amuse but to criticise their master or mistress and their guests. Queen Elizabeth (reigned 1558-1603) is said to have rebuked one of her fools for being insufficiently severe with her. Excessive behaviour, however, could lead to a fool being whipped, as Lear threatens to whip his fool." [1]


"Distinction was made between fools and clowns, or country bumpkins. The fool's status was one of privilege within a royal or noble household. His folly could be regarded as the raving of a madman but was often deemed to be divinely inspired. The 'natural' fool was touched by God. Much to Gonerill's annoyance, Lear's 'all-licensed' Fool enjoys a privileged status. His characteristic idiom suggests he is a 'natural' fool, not an artificial one, though his perceptiveness and wit show that he is far from being an idiot, however 'touched' he might be.[1]"

moonlight1021 said...

The Blog's Jester says:

This post is so practical and multi-purpose: it means different things to different people. And since all people tend to have their own decree of introversion/narcissism and interpret the world according to their own vision (as opposed to a more well balanced, well embracing field of view), they think it talks about themselves. Certainly this applies in particular to the jester, everyone else is not included.

So Rabbi Sacks can we please get more posts, more often?

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Everyone

I will try very hard to both respond and post more often, thanks for the encouragement.

Moonlight

Pay close attention to R. Pinny comment about the Letz.

Dan

I was actually not criticizing the author, did it seem like I was? I meant to agree with his desire to be rid of neurotic self hating or deprecating "comedy" like Woody Allen or, to a much lesser extent, Adam Sandler.