Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Post Tisha B'av discussion

Mrs Adler's questions

#1
So to apply this to the American political system - the danger of identifying as a 'Democrat' or a 'Republican' is that you might fall prey to the belief that any man-made system has all the answers, forgetting the limits of human control, and forgetting G-d and thus potentially forfeiting the opportunity to really find the correct path by applying true wisdom principles.  That would be true of any 'knee-jerk' emotional reaction to a political problem.
 
#2
 
But even so - could one by accident be following the 'better' of existing paths, even though the process of getting there is not ideal?  Perhaps you follow a political ideoligy because that is what most Jews do, or it is what your parents did.  Is it not still possible that it might be the more sensible path even though you have not adopted it due to true examination of its principles.  
 
#3
 
And where does patriotism fit into this?  Surely there is a role for that somewhere.  America is not perfect because it is the product of human endeavor - but it is so far superior to so many places.  What is the place for hakorat hatov here?  
 
#4
 
I also have a lot of questions as to how we should approach Eretz Yisrael as American Jews.  So many Jews assume that there is an inherent kedushah to the land which I assume might be part of the more dangerous aspect of religious Zionism.  What do you think about that?
 
My Response
 
#1 
 
 Yes, the idea of Geula includes having a healthy skepticism toward all nationalism. Healthy skepticism does not mean that we deny the unique accomplishments of the USA however. The founding principles of our country are a historic accomplishment and should be treasured as such. We should moderate our appreciation however, with an expectation that the USA, like any human system, will still have limitations Geula via the Torah is the ultimate solution to.

A very important basis of growth that Ralbag points to in Kohelet is opening one's mind to other approaches. Republican's would do well to seek out the weakness in their approach that democrats are stronger in. The reverse is certainly true as well. This is the hallmark of the true leader, finding the common ground that enriches all approaches and removes their extreme limiting character.
 
#2 
 
There are certainly better and worse non Jewish approaches, as there are better and worse Jewish ones. One may indeed fall on better and worse approaches by accident. The son of Avraham, Yitzchak, was in a vastly better situation than any of the sons of Haman. To truly grow however, one must use free choice in moving beyond ones first education, whatever the source of that education might have been, even Yitzchak and Avraham Avinu.

#3
 
 The better the principles of the country one is in, the more one should appreciate that country. One has a duty to work together with fellow citizens to bring out the best in our country in all matters that relate to our shared wellbeing. In matters of Religion however, we strongly endorse the separation of church and state and are against Missionary activity of any kind, Jewish or non Jewish.

#4

If we properly define Kedusha, there is no problem with saying their is an intrinsic Kedusha to Israel. The problem arises when we view Kedusha as a mystical force, rather than a category of existing things. Kedusha refers to an entity that is distinct from others in some important way. We say Kiddush on Shabbos to distinguish its unique character as a time. Israel is unique as the designated place of redemption where the principles of Torah will ultimately be expressed in a truly free human civilization.
 
 




 
 
 

11 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
moonlight1021 said...

In terms of separation of religion and state, if a state would adopt Judaism/Torah as its basis, would you still advocate for separation?

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

When Moshiach comes and ressurrects a truly Jewish state based upon wisdom, I would of course support this.

moonlight1021 said...

On the other hand, for Moshiach to come don't you think the people also have to make the effort to bring Moshiach?

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

People should absolutely not try to bring Moshiach. We should keep Judaism properly and realistically. If we succeed in keeping Mitzvot wisely, Moshiach will be a natural result.

moonlight1021 said...

In the History of Zionism class I took in college, I learned that having a state in Eretz Yisrael was opposed by anti-Zionists b/c they said that one may not have a state until Moshiach comes. Are you adhering to this perspective when you say people should not try to bring Moshiach? The Zionism position was that one can take steps in order to bring Moshiach, and having a state is part of it too.

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

There is no reason to confuse having a state with "bringing Moshiach". In Chanuka the Jews reconstituted the State. There is absolutely no indication that they were trying to bring Moshiach, they kept the Mitzvot of building a Mikdash and Korbanot,as well as having a King that is all.

Yaakov said...

One can take a different approach, namely that Yishuv Eretz Yisrael is a mitzvah, even nowadays having nothing to do with trying to hasten mashiach.
Or the approach of Rabbi Reines which is that Chachmah dictates living in Israel.
Hence one can be prozionist but not mystical/messianic

Yaakov said...

Sorry I did not see Rabbi Sack's comment, I am not disagreeing with his comment. I was responding to moonlight.

Anonymous said...

Pakistan Education Says:

It’s a very informative and useful article. This article is very affective to increase knowledge of students. I am very thankful to you for this information.

noman1 said...

bise Faisalabad 9th class result 2017