Saturday, December 1, 2007

Becoming a mind

The Torah, according to Ralbag, is “a regimen that orders those who practice it properly to true success”. This “regimen” seems to be divided into three stages- Mitzvot, political behavior and the wisdom of the universe:
A) The first element, mistakenly thought of by many as the entire mission of the Torah, are the Mitzvos which encompass what we have been commanded to believe and do as well as what not to believe or do. This category includes 613 Mitzvos according to the traditional method of counting.

B) The second element encompasses the study of political behavior and society generally. This area is a domain outside of legislative action, because it presupposes a level of human development well beyond the capacity of the standard citizen. To illustrate, let us consider if the Torah were to legislate that we must not be angry except for what one ideally should be angry about, and even then only to the ideal measure of anger, in the proper time and place. Or perhaps that one should not be happy except for what one ideally should be happy about, and even then only to the ideal measure of happiness, in the proper time and place…. All people would be in violation of the law continuously, excluding a minute few...

C) The third element includes what the Torah grants us of the Wisdom of the universe, that cannot be attained through human research, save by exhaustive effort, if a man should fail to avail himself of its prophetic stories that guide us to this hasaga (apprehension)
These three stages seem to be complementary elements of a developmental curriculum as Ralbag states later on. The core of the curriculum seems to be the Mitzvot, which the other two stages “build upon”.
It is of necessity that the Torah regimen should be divided into these elements, since human excellence can not be fully realized, except by attaining excellence of both man's constitution and research to the most excellent degree. Now the element that encompasses the study of political /social affairs that are beyond command and prohibition, is a next step that builds upon what has already been attained by mitzvot in the domain of developing man's psychological constitution. The study of the wisdom of the universe is a next step that builds upon what has already been attained by mitzvot in the domain of developing man's soul...
1) What does Ralbag mean by “attaining excellence of both man's constitution and research“ and how is this attainment accomplished through “building upon the Mitzvot” ?

2) In what way is this process of “attaining excellence of both man's constitution and research“ connected to Ralbag's previous tefilla?

To answer this we must understand something of Ralbag's concept of “becoming”. As mentioned in the previous post, Ralbag's first order of business was to awaken a reader used to thinking of himself as an independent power to the reality of Hashgacha as an external cause of his own ability. This Hashgacha is clearly an outgrowth of Chochmas Hashem that is behind the creation of the ecosystem of Earth of which man is part of
Praised be the Creator, who, because of His desire to benefit the creations and facilitate their maturation, directed His hashgacha upon these lowly beings, developing them through the appropriate stages climaxing with the emergence of Mankind
It is an essential feature of the Earthly ecosystem that all members undergo a “cycle of life”. Minerals become vegetables and vegetables become animals. In due course the living tissue degenerates and returns to being mineral. This cycle of life or “becoming” is not limited to the animal kingdom but extends to man as well,both in terms of his animal character as well as his mind and education.
This hashgacha is not limited to the magnificence of man’s anatomy and physical abilities by which his physical existence is maintained. It extends to guiding man along the path of mental development- the one true fruit of human existence for whose sake alone the lowly material of Aretz is endowed with tzura to the extent that it is. We refer of course to the divine Torah, which is a regimen that orders those who practice it properly to true success.
The nature of the human condition is to be aware of a system of becoming of which he himself is a part. Unlike a chemical or vegetable or animal that mechanistically undergo a process which they are unaware of and are therefore incapable of controlling, man is aware of the very process he undergoes. As Rambam puts it
Every person is granted freedom. If he wants to steer himself toward the good path and be a Tzaddik-he has the freedom to do so. If he wants to steer himself toward the evil path and be a Rasha-he has the freedom to do so. This point is written in the Torah as its says” behold Man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil” (Brayshees 3, 22). What this means is that the species of man is unique in the material world, no other species is like it in the fact that Man himself, through his own thought and judgment, knows what is good and evil and acts as he wills with no one opposing him from doing good and evil...
It is our very awareness of the general process of becoming that gives us a choice of what we will become. We can choose to seek out the causes of the system we are part of and become minds that use our animal nature as a platform-or we can choose not to seek causes and become pure animals. It is this process of human becoming that Torah is an aid to. It is also within this process of becoming that we can understand the three stages of Torah education. In essence, the becoming of man revolves around the issue of re-engineering the animal platform away from being a tool of animal dominance and pleasure and towards being a tool of research. This re-engineering consists of two parts
a) creating a psyche that functions as an able platform for intellectual research b) creating an intellect that actually researches the wisdom underlying the Creations.

Both of these re-engineerings are begun in Mitzvos and “built upon” by later research. As Ralbag puts it “the Mitzvos ... encompass what we have been commanded to believe and do as well as what not to believe or do”. So long as we relate to our beliefs and actions authoritatively, ie without independent proof grounded in our intellectual understanding of “becoming”, they are rudimentary and need to be built upon. This building goes through two stages. The first stage is grasping the causes of Mitzvot as “political social” phenomena only, as instruments of maintaining order in society. The second level moves beyond, seeing mitzvot as part of order as seen throughout the “wisdom of the universe”.

We can now see the process of “attaining excellence of both man's constitution and research“. But what is the connection to the tefilla?

Man's challenge in recognizing his place in becoming is that we view the world through the lens of our animal eyes and psyche. Prior to re-engineering ourselves we do not see a world of “ becoming” governed by Chochmas Hashem of which we ourselves are part. We see a world of raw materials awaiting our own dominion and design. As animals we take our own internal drive to dominate as a given, an unquestioned premise whose good cannot be reflected upon let alone challenged. It is the Baal Mesorah who awakens us from this belief, helps us consider a new possibility. Ralbag's call to tefilla is therefore integrally involved in the “becoming” of his talmid the reader. To become aware of Hashgacha is not merely to leave a sense of power to know. It is to become aware of the animal material that was the source of our predisposition to believe we had this power and viewed the world as purely raw materials in which this power should be expressed.

One and the same realization is then the cause both of the need for tefilla as well as the order of limud Mitzvot. The special place of man in material becoming, the challenge of choosing to transform animality in the ways needed to embrace mindedness is the source of both.

8 comments:

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

"To become aware of Hashgacha is not merely to leave a sense of power to know. It is to become aware of the animal material that was the source of our predisposition to believe we had this power and viewed the world as purely raw materials in which this power should be expressed."


Can you clarify this statement? I am not seeing the mechayiv for the Ralbag's tefillah in the hagdama.

Pinny

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

The eseential issue is being in harmony with the reality of a hashgachic cause of our existence as developing people.

This issue comes to a head in the introduction to the Chumash, the beginning of GAINING ACCESS to the derech avoda-proper reaction to the reality of hashgachic chochma.

We must not mereely theoretically think about the reality of Hashgacha in theoretical talmud torah terms-there is a chochma in all beruim including man that points to the need for Him.. Prior to talmud torah is acknowledging Hashgacha as a matter of personal identity-I am a a creature that needs hashgacha because \i need help becoming a mind and leaving animality-in all things including my quest to know the world of bruim.
THE MORE IMPORTANT STEP IS THE PERSONAL ONE.
This is the need for tefilla prior to theoretical limud about the nature of torah.

But the reality of the need for hashgacha in the world of becoming that I AM PART OF IS NOT LIMITED TO BEING MITPALLEL BEFORE LEARNING. It also determines the seder of topics to be learned once I AM LEARNING. I MUST START WITH MITZVOT THAT BEGIN THE RELEASE FROM ANIMALITY AND MOVE ON TO POLITICS AND WISDOM THAT COMPLETE THE THEORETICAL STUDY.

Matt said...

RS,

After rereading your post, I think I know what the main problem is - at least, for me. But bear with me: I don't know enough psychology to define my problem in conceptual terms. All I can do is describe my feelings to you, and in order to do so, I will have to use subjective terminology. Here it goes.

My problem is that these ideas do not feel relevant to me. As I read, I kept thinking to myself: "What do these ideas have to do with my life?"

I think this problem is rooted in the fact that I am a kid, in the sense of the Rambam's mashal. The teacher can't tell the kid, "Hey kid, don't you want to choose to seek out the causes of the system you are part of and become a mind that uses your animal nature as a platform for intellectual research?" The kid would either say: "NOOO!" or "Huh?" Such an ideal is so completely removed from his realm of interest that it would either be meaningless or it would be distorted in a superego way, for better or for worse.

(Pardon me: this next part is VERY descriptive.) I sense that I relate to these ideas in two "modes": Talmud Torah Mode (like when we learn on Shabbos) and Real Life Mode. When I am in Talmud Torah Mode, then all of my Talmud Torah lo lishmahs kick in and I am engaged and interested, but when I am in Real Life Mode, these ideas seem so far removed that they feel completely unrelated to my life. I feel like a layman reading about human anatomy in a medical textbook: I know that I am learning about myself, but I do not view myself as a network of bones, muscles, and nerves. When I am not in Talmud Torah Mode, reading the Ralbag feels like a book of metaphysical human anatomy: I do not feel like he is talking about me.

I think that the solution lies in the Rambam's mashal. I am a pleasure-seeking domination-driven animal, and it seems that the only way for me to become interested and invested in these ideas in a real way is through some animal appeal.

That is why I like Mishlei so much. Shlomo ha'Melech initiates his students into the world of chochmah by appealing to their animal ambitions and drives: "Praiseworthy is the person who has found chochmah, the person who can derive tevunah, for its commerce is better than the commerce of silver, and its produce than fine gold. It is more precious than pearls, and all your desires cannot compare to it. Length of days is at its right; at its left, wealth and honor. Its ways are ways of pleasantness and all its pathways are peace." I don't know what all those things mean, but they sure SOUND good! Moreover, the rest of his book describes the great benefits that come with a life of chochmah and the harmful consequences of neglecting chochmah. These are things that I can understand AND that matter to me. "Becoming a mind" appeals to my superego somewhat, but it doesn't make me want to live life the way the Ralbag says.

I guess an analogy would be the beginning martial arts student. If the master only talked about the lofty goals of martial arts and how martial arts transforms and elevates the human being, almost nobody would be interested. The beginning student wants to punch and kick things; he's not interested in finding inner balance and humbly submitting to the order of things. Perhaps after many years, once the student develops an interest in the chochmah of the art itself, he will become interested in the higher objectives, but for now, all he cares about is using martial arts as a tool of domination. The master has no choice but to work with that.

Maybe you'll ask: "But aren't these ideas engaging and interesting when you are in Talmud Torah Mode?" Yes. Talmud Torah mode is nice, but I've found that the only ideas which actually change me are the ones that I acquire in Real Life Mode. (Incidentally, that is why learning with Ken is the best: learning with Ken is never an academic experience, but a clarification of how to live.) I can't think of any ideas I've learned in Talmud Torah mode that have actually changed how I view myself and the rest of reality.

(I'm starting to realize that perhaps I'll need to clearly define Talmud Torah Mode and Real Life Mode, but I think I'll leave it at that for now. I hope you can sense what I'm getting at.)

Practically speaking, I only have two suggestions about how to formulate your ideas in a way that would solve my problems (not that your goal in writing the blog should be to solve my problems): (1) Give plenty of real-life examples, (2) Avoid obscure-sounding, unnatural, and longwinded sentences that are filled with "codewords." I think I mentioned my "layman's test" to you over the summer. My approach writing is to try to make everything I say comprehensible to a layman. If you went up to a guy on the street and said, "To become aware of Hashgacha is not merely to leave a sense of power to know. It is to become aware of the animal material that was the source of our predisposition to believe we had this power and viewed the world as purely raw materials in which this power should be expressed," he would say "huh?" Your formulation may be clear and precise, but people don't talk like that, and since they don't talk like that, they don't think like that. You tend to write like a Aristotle or Ralbag, which is great in many ways, but not for making ideas real to simple people, like me.

All of this is only in terms of denotation, but I think there is also a problem with the connotation of your writing. Since you talk in such a highfalutin way - at least, in the eyes of the layman - it makes it seem like you are talking to yourself instead of your readers. This isn't a problem when we are learning in person, since your concern for others is clear, but this doesn't come across in your writing - at least, to me.

Well, I've certainly taken up more than my share of space. I hope all of this doesn't sound too harsh. Again, this is only my subjective reaction to the ideas you've presented, as you've presented them. Clearly, other readers of your blog to not share my problems.

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Matt,

I suspect that everyone finds my writing much like you do. Thanks for the helpful tips, Ill try to implement them.

Dan said...

Rabbi,

My question is actually not about the post, it's about the the intro to your site. Can you clarify what you mean by "logic based"? And how is this the key to the objective of the site.

Thanks,
Dan

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

The Aristotelians theory of soul was rooted in the notion that a soul acquires knowledge in a specific manner. This manner is a natural process.

As all natural processes,the acquisition of knowledge by the soul can be enhanced by human ordering- as for example the way a farmer enhances the natural fertility of the Earth in the vraft of agriculture.

In similar fashion the natural fertility of mind can be enhanced by proper craft-the craft of logic.
Insofar as the works of Rambam are organized around the notion of a soul enhanced by logic-his work is logic based. Acquiring facility in logic would therefore be a significant aspect of appreciating the communication of Rambam in his works-the Rambam system.

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks said...

Dan imagine if Adler were to write books that were specifically designed for one well versed in "how to read a book". Obviously one not familiar with this craft of reading would miss out on a lot of the intended message.